.
Feedback

UPDATE: Police: Wootton Junior Plotted to Kill

Seventeen-year-old has been charged as an adult.

UPDATE April 29 11:22am -- Steven P. Choi has waived his preliminary hearing in Montgomery County District Court, giving prosecutors 30 days to pursue felony charges in Circuit Court, amend the charges or drop them altogether.

Choi, of the 13000 block of Riding Loop Drive in North Potomac, could have held a preliminary hearing this morning to contest his charges of attempted carjacking, armed robbery and possession of a concealed weapon stemming from his April 18 arrest.

"We're not going to make any comment outside of whatever we say in court," Robert Bonsib, Choi's attorney, said in a phone interview.

UPDATE April 25 5:30pm -- School officials are not commenting on whether Steven P. Choi will be allowed to return to class at Thomas S. Wootton High School pending the outcome of his arrest last week.

When a student is facing criminal charges, it is up to the school's principal and top administrators to determine whether it will be safe for them to be in school while their legal proceedings take their course, said Leslie Maxwell, spokeswoman for Montgomery County Public Schools.

Wootton Assistant Principal Ira Thomas declined to comment on Choi's status as a student, citing privacy restrictions.

"All I can tell you is that we are aware of the situation," he said. "I have spoken with the family and with the police and we are working with both."

Stuart Levin, vice president of Wootton's PTSA, said that school officials notified him of the situation this morning, but he declined to comment further.

Choi's attorney, Megan Green of MarcusBonsib, LLC, has not returned calls from Patch.

ORIGINAL STORY April 25 2:30pm -- A 17-year-old from North Potomac plotted to steal a car in Rockville and kill someone but was arrested last week before he could carry out his plan, according to Montgomery County police and prosecutors.

Police found Steven P. Choi, 17, of the 13000 block of Riding Loop Drive, on April 18 fleeing from a shopping center at Darnestown Road and Key West Avenue with a "large kitchen knife," a note detailing his plot and latex gloves to conceal his fingerprints, according to court records. He had been "lurking" at the shopping center for hours before robbing , according to court records.

Choi has been charged as an adult with armed robbery, attempted carjacking and possession of a concealed weapon.

"The plan in this case was to take a vehicle and kill someone," near Northwest High School, Assistant State’s Attorney Ray Pilkerton said at Choi’s bail review hearing in Montgomery County District Court.

Megan Green, Choi’s attorney, asked that bail be lowered from $50,000, pointing out that he has no criminal record, has nearly all A’s at Thomas S. Wootton High School and is the son of a former NIH scientist. He also volunteers at a day care center, according to court records.

Choi recently blacked out at school, possibly in connection with lifelong medical issues, Green said, and has a family history of mental problems: His mother committed suicide a few years ago. Choi’s family wants him to receive treatment and to be in school, she said.

"I can’t explain why. … Something triggered in the last few weeks," Green said. "He needs assistance, and he’s not going to get assistance if he’s in jail."

Judge Eugene B. Wolfe kept the bail at $50,000 and ordered that Choi turn over his passports. He is a dual citizen of the United States and South Korea.

Choi’s father posted bond the next day.

While court documents and his lawyer say Choi is a junior at Wootton, school officials said they could not find record of him being a student.

Doug Tallman April 26, 2011 at 01:00 am
Message deleted because it violated our terms of use.
lol April 26, 2011 at 02:01 am
This publisher, who is probably at least 30 ? or at least looks older, just got wreked by a high schooler ...
I think you should quit your job as a reporter/ jounalist Thank you
Kentucky Fried Moss April 26, 2011 at 02:14 am
Steve's right. Get your facts straight before posting this on the front page
anonymous April 26, 2011 at 02:42 am
I am very appalled by the fact this article was published for the general public's viewing. Despite the fact that the defendant is charged as an adult, I am shocked that the author disclosed sensitive, personal information that an adolescent would never want anyone else to know. From his education information to his family history, the defendant is now stripped from all privacy, something that every citizen of the U.S. deserves, especially minors. Legality aside, it would have been far more appropriate to leave the teen's name anonymous, as the trial is ON GOING. The adolescent may have made some poor decisions that resulted in this mess, but painting him as a murderer and not giving real consideration to his psychological condition is tasteless. By your senseless victimization of a NOT YET GUILTY AS CHARGED adolescent, you must take responsibility for potential consequences emanating from the publication of this article. How do you expect the defendant to carry out a proper defense while trying to maintain his normal life (in case he is cleared of all charges) after you sabotaged his entire life? You sir, are a sadistic man who enjoys hammering nails into coffins of those you killed with your words even before they have had a chance to clear their name.
Some_Dude April 26, 2011 at 03:35 am
Steve just plead to the fifth. You writing things online doesnt help your case. I understand your frustrated with the fact that this man is spreading inacurate information but, the man is not going to take down his post because a high schooler told him to. Mr. Montes, you on the other hand are in violation of privacy rights that every citizen of the U.S. is entitled to.First, from what we can see the journalist, Sebastian Montes, has already broken the modern tort law of invasion of privacy, or to be more specific the modern tort law of publicly disclosing private facts. I do not need to go into any further detail of what these "private facts" are because they are already posted. Second, you have also violated the Right of Publicity. The law states that any third-party (You are the third-party or in other words, you have no relation to the person that you have given the name of.) can not use the name of a person for his or her commercial use. Now, there are two types of Right of Publicity but, the one I am currently talking about is the Right to Privacy, which states that a person has the right to be left alone and his or her information not be disclosed to the public. Yes, this has been used most for property but, the law, Mr. Montes, can be twisted very easily, or in other words, the law is very vague. So, Mr. Montes, be wary of what you write. Also how does it feel to be slammed by a highschooler ^^.
anonymous April 26, 2011 at 04:15 am
I don't know whether the author of the post above knows what he is talking about with regard to law, but sensible, professional journalists follow this code of conduct.
As per Society of Professional Journalist http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp — Diligently seek out subjects of news stories to give them the opportunity to respond to allegations of wrongdoing. — Make certain that headlines, news teases and promotional material, photos, video, audio, graphics, sound bites and quotations do not misrepresent. They should not oversimplify or highlight incidents out of context. — Recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone’s privacy. — Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity. — Be cautious about identifying juvenile suspects or victims of sex crimes. — Be judicious about naming criminal suspects before the formal filing of charges. — Balance a criminal suspect’s fair trial rights with the public’s right to be informed. Though this code is voluntary and is NOT enforced by law, it clearly shows the lack of professionalism in your work.
Matt April 26, 2011 at 04:47 am
Whether or not the story is true or exaggerated, the victim indeed deserves privacy. The trial is still on-going and this article is basically stating the outcomes of an unfinished trial. The least thing the author could have done was not mention the name of the victim. But he continues and goes on to expose his education, personal, family information to the public. Mr. Montes, there is nothing more public than the world wide web. Like one of the comments above...what happens if this trial turns to Mr. Choi's favor? You have already exposed his personal life matters that will probably hinder his daily social life.
Just no one April 26, 2011 at 05:39 am
Steve, I agree with Some_Dude.
All the other comments are right about the reporter and how unprofessional he is. However, when the article is about you and not in your favor, it is best not to comment on it. And I completely believe you when you say that you are neither angry nor frustrated, and yes i even share your pity for the reporter, but you must keep yourself low, at least for the moment. This is for your own sake. Remember, you're not alone.
mariah April 27, 2011 at 12:27 am
Mister Sebastian Montes,
I find it very inappropriate for you to post information about Steve's personal life. I feel that you have no idea as a "journalist" to keep your class and keep his privacy out of the internet. I have never read ANY article like this in my life where you state a minors name and family issues. This is simply ridiculous.
Dee April 27, 2011 at 11:48 am
What "victim" are you talking about? The victim is the person at the CVS he robbed and the person he plotted to kill. He is a defendant. The personal information obtained has to of come from friends, family or neighbors that shared the information. Whose fault is that?
Ever heard of Va Tech?
Sebastian Montes (Editor) April 27, 2011 at 11:27 pm
Comment deleted for violating our terms of use.
lilkunta April 28, 2011 at 12:51 pm
IMO nothing posted here violates Steven Choi's privacy bc all info mentioned here could be learned from the casesearch website and going to the police station.
Bryan May 2, 2011 at 07:15 pm
Most teenagers that are tried as adults have all their information post usually. No privacy was violated.
Deb O May 2, 2011 at 11:30 pm
This kid and a bunch of his friends commenting. No mention of the robbery ...or the person he was trying to kill. He needs to stay in North Potomac and stay out of Germantown...don't bring any murderous intent to Northwest HS. If he has a problem then get him some help...,but to defend this criminal is ridiculous. I don't care how many A's he has or what his father does for a living. He needs to get a grip on his son. If you do the crime then you must do the time.
anonymous May 4, 2011 at 02:30 am
@Deb O. There is no mention of the robbery or the person he was trying to kill because there was no victim in either case. Get your facts right before you go off spouting false information under false pretense with intended malice. That's a million dollar lawsuit right there; this kid could put you and your family out on the street with your comment. In fact, I'm going to save this page with this comment right now so I can send it to him later. Good luck, see you in court.
And at all the other people who say this does not infringe upon his right to privacy. Of course his name and his charges could be learned at a case search website, but the details of his actions and the statement of the charges cannot, therefore Sebastian Montes has committed libel, presumably with intended malice, as he knew that Steven Choi would get backlash from this article. There's another couple million dollar lawsuit. You guys should really get your facts straight. Steven will see both "Deb O" and Sebastian Montes in court, and will walk out of that courtroom with a couple million dollars in his pocket, leaving these undeserving slanderous people out on the street. Good luck, Steven.
lilkunta May 5, 2011 at 02:10 pm
@DebO" I agree. The posters here must be friends of Steve who think it is funny. Attn Wooten students: grow up!
@anon 10:30p Tu 3 May : You are wrong & stupid. Even when defamation lawsuits are successful, there is never a check written out in court. So Steve wouldn't walk out of court with a 1 million $ check. Do us all a favour and stay in school ok?
Bryan May 5, 2011 at 05:44 pm
Lol. That is funny. You can't sue someone for expressing their opinions anonymously on a website. And no its not a violation of privacy. If a kid is charged as an adult his information is basically up for grabs. Do a quick search "16 year old charged as adult" or "17 year old charged as adult". You'd be surprised to see how much info is out there for these minors.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Montgomery Village Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
LW June 19, 2013 at 04:20 pm
Please cut down the DEAD trees along MV Avenue before the National Arbor Day Foundation & theRead More National Association of State Foresters and the USDA Forest Service take away the honor.
Bob Hydorn June 1, 2013 at 12:01 pm
Thank you to John Driscoll, VP of the MVF for opening this years Farmers Market
Bandits New Mom June 1, 2013 at 01:59 pm
Amazing the difference in taste! I thought I like baked sweet potatoes until I bought some from theRead More farmer's market--now I eat them for dessert! Amazingly sweeter and redder too!
Sharon June 1, 2013 at 04:16 pm
Seems someone @ MVF finally considered one of my community suggestions, free raffle baskets. KnewRead More after 32 years you might 'finally' appreciate at least one of my ideas. Hummm! LOL!
LenGray March 4, 2013 at 06:28 pm
Congratulations to Ms. Cranford, Ms. Peterson and Mr. Dyer on a strong showing. The one issue that IRead More do hope you will consider during your term in office is the request that Ms. Adams had made about a playground in Whetstone Park. There realty does need to be some improvements made there, the old concrete animals are no longer fun to play on. My grandson asks me, “Grandpa, where are the slide and swings?” At least we now have a chance with these three board members.
Derek Hale March 5, 2013 at 05:02 am
The voters obviously made the right decision. These three have proven themselves with theirRead More previous activities within the Village. I concur with LenGray's comment above regarding different children's amenities available at Lake Whetstone. If swings and other play equipment were there, it could be used almost year round which a volleyball sand pit has limited use, and I can't even remember the last time I saw someone playing volleyball there. How about some benches for the adults to sit and watch their children play on good old fashioned swings and slides?