The Worthington Post - Is There No Way to Win?

A discussion of two very high-profile, highly personal decisions. (Not mine.)

I would love to get Anne-Marie Slaughter and Marissa Mayer in a room together. They could commiserate about how their personal life choices are the subject of such public scrutiny and criticism. They could play a drinking game wherein every time someone cheers for them to succeed they take a shot. Every time someone insists they'll fail (or has already failed) they take two shots. Before you know it, they'd be sitting back-to-back on the floor, totally blitzed and eating pizza and giggling at crazy cat videos on YouTube.

Need me to back up for a sec? Okay. I am talking about two women who have caused quite a stir in the last month or so: Anne-Marie Slaughter, for leaving an extremely high-powered job in Washington, D.C., to be more present for her teen-aged sons and to return to her (merely) extremely demanding job as a full-time professor at Princeton; Marissa Mayer for taking an extremely high-powered job as Yahoo!'s CEO at the same time she announces she is pregnant.

These women can't win for trying. Anne-Marie Slaughter is honest and forthright about the toll such jobs take on a parent, and realistic about what is best for her family. Marissa Mayer is brilliant and ambitious—much the way I imagine Slaughter was at the same age—and confident in her ability to manage an insane career with having a new baby (her first, by the way.) Both are being cheered and jeered—just from opposite sides.

Prof. Slaughter faces criticism and condescension from her peers and fellow feminists for asserting that women can't have it all. She is being thanked by exhausted women who sacrifice for their kids, either by staying home with them or having a job, or both at the same time.

Ms. Mayer is criticized by women who are smugly saying "You think you'll be back to work after three weeks? You've NO earthly idea what is about to hit you," and judgmentally saying "Fine, I guess if you never wanna see your baby and have him raised by strangers, go for it." She's garnering praise from the same group criticizing Slaughter—"She's the poster girl for having it all! She's the beneficiary of all we've worked for! You GO, girl!"

Let me propose an alternative response to each.

To Anne-Marie Slaughter, I'd say, "You are a brilliant, incredibly accomplished woman. You've shined a bright light on some of the real problems even successful working women face. You've politely and respectfully asked millions of women to step back and evaluate their choices and paths, without being judgmental of others who choose differently. You should be supported and applauded as you make this transition out of public service and back into private education and a closer family life. Use your considerable power for Good."

To Marissa Mayer, I'd say, "You are a brilliant, incredibly accomplished woman. You've shattered the glass ceiling in the heavily male field of technological innovation. You're about to have a baby. You should be supported and applauded as you try to forge a workable balance between career and new motherhood. Use your considerable power for Good. (And if, when the baby arrives, you decide you need more than three weeks of maternity leave, I hope you allow yourself the flexibility to take it. I hope the those on Yahoo!'s Board of Directors collectively chuckle and say, 'We thought you might need more than three weeks. Take as much as you need and your job will still be there for you.')"

To Yahoo!, I'd say, "Great job hiring the best person for the job, even though you knew she is pregnant. Now's your chance to make a high-profile and meaningful change to improve the lives of working mothers in your company, and set a real example. Like my new friend at Lizrael Update insightfully advocates, help her show the world that Corporate America thrives when its families do. You can do it. Be like this guy, who pays his employees $7,500 to take their vacation time, and use it to really get away from it all. Take care of your own. Because seriously, today's workplace culture and economic climate are not exactly cutting it.

Understandably, cries of classism permeate the discussion of both women. For Prof. Slaughter, it's "Sure—she has a CHOICE of picking the job that lets her spend more time with her kids. Must be NICE." For Ms. Mayer, it's "Sure, she can stay at her job—she's a BAZILLIONAIRE, and can have nannies out the wazoo. Must be NICE." No matter how justified the resentment, this attitude is toxic and counterproductive. I wish it would stop.

People, you want these women to meet with success in whichever path they choose. Here's why. We NEED women in high-power positions to succeed. We NEED them to run for office. We NEED them to have a seat at the table so they can advocate for a supportive workplace culture. We want them to thrive so that they can put in place innovative policies that TRULY support a work/family balance that works for BOTH genders. So they can fight for fairness in health care and family leave, and fight against discrimination in the workplace. So that every woman, every family, can have at least a few healthy and fulfilling life options to pursue. THAT would be true choice, would it not?

This post also available on my website, www.theworthingtonpost.net.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Aliza Worthington July 23, 2012 at 01:41 AM
@Leslie - yes, it is my blog. I wrote about what I wanted. It included the opinion that bashing these women for their decisions was counterproductive. It included the desire that we be a little more gentle with each other and less judgmental. It included the hope that AMS and MM might use their influence to shape policy to better the lives of the women for whom Theresa D. and you (and I, by the way) are advocating. I fail to see how we are at odds, except for the fact that I happen to be rooting for them to succeed. I am rooting for all of us to succeed. Be more provocative? I didn't even think this was a terribly controversial blog, and look at the passion it's induced. Clearly, I have pissed people off.
Theresa Defino July 23, 2012 at 03:04 AM
Which people? Not me! I enjoy a healthy debate and I am not rooting for anyone to fail--as I've said, they don't need me either way. Leslie is right--the struggle of these two women helps (maybe) a shrinking minority. At that risk of repeating myself, I'm just saying let's look at the bigger picture, the NEW picture, the changing one that's more difficult and challenging to address--yet more in tune with reality. It's not the 1950s. I am not sure how you are advocating for women, but I personally have worked on several political campaigns for women with some success. I'm also involved with Emerge Maryland. Part of Emerge America, it helps train and support female Dem candidates. You might already know about them. If not, here's the FB page https://www.facebook.com/pages/Emerge-Maryland/155413654572378 and parent site: http://www.emergeamerica.org
MocoLoco July 23, 2012 at 02:13 PM
Theresa--working to support female democratic candidates does not equal "advocating for women." As you may know, the group you mentioned, Emerge America, recently lost its tax-exempt status because the IRS found that its activities were conducted primarily for the benefit of the Democratic Party rather than social welfare. And, I think your posts indicate how much you are letting the emerging class warfare obscure the fact that all women, rich or poor, educated or not, share some struggles. The blogger (bloggress?) points this out, and the prominence of her subjects has helped bring publicity to these issues. That's a good thing.
Theresa Defino July 23, 2012 at 04:53 PM
@mocoloco, who said--Theresa--working to support female democratic candidates does not equal "advocating for women." It does to me. And I don't really care what you think of my posts. I don't follow or judge yours.
Rachel Fogel July 23, 2012 at 07:00 PM
I say......i say.......i say................................................................. let's sit down.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »