patching...
Breaking: Longshot Oxbow Wins Preakness Stakes »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

SPEAK OUT: 'Undocumented' or 'Illegal'?

The phrase you choose can cast aspersions and draw allegiances at its mere utterance.

 

Amid the raging invective focused on the nation’s efforts to deal with unlawful immigration, a war of words wages in the undercurrent—a subtle struggle over the language used to define the discussion.

Are the millions of people in the United States who are not here lawfully “illegal” or are they “undocumented”?

The question is not mere semantics, activists and experts say: Choosing one over the other exposes allegiances and stokes the embers of animosity.

Take for example the ballots that await Maryland voters in this November’s election. Question 4—the referendum on Maryland’s version of the “Dream Act”—will ask whether the state should allow “undocumented immigrants” to be eligible for in-state tuition.

Immigrant advocates tend to abhor “illegal” as a racially charged epithet that dehumanizes the people it's applied to.

Their opponents deride “undocumented” as politically correct pandering, and most of the nation’s media outlets dismiss it as a euphemism that portrays a person’s lack of legal status as a mere afterthought, as if to diminish the severity of having sneaked across the border or overstayed a visa.

In newspeak, “illegal immigrant” is ostensibly the norm, per decree of the Associated Press Stylebook, the standard-bearer for newspaper reporters and editors.

Last year’s update to the AP Stylebook retained “illegal immigrant” despite continued pleas from the National Association of Hispanic Journalists and other groups, reported Poynter.org

AP’s reasoning?

“Undocumented suggests that the issue is more about paperwork than one’s legal right to be in a country,” AP’s David Minthorn told Poynter.

Immigrant activists are pushing back with the national Drop the I-Word campaign, which pressures media outlets to stop using the purportedly pejorative terms.

The U.S. Supreme Court rekindled the debate this summer by dodging it altogether: “Undocumented” and “illegal” were both conspicuously missing from the court’s June 25 ruling to uphold the core of Arizona’s controversial immigration law. The justices opted instead for “unlawful” and “unauthorized” as modifiers of the legalistic descriptor “alien.”

The court’s linguistic leapfrogging set off a polemical uproar as pundits pushed the primacy of one term over the other. A pair of op-eds on CNN.com neatly encapsulated the debate.

In the first, Charles Garcia saw the Supreme Court’s omission of “illegal” as the onset of a “humanistic approach” to eventual immigration reform and bluntly declared “illegal” to be nothing short of a racial slur.

“If you don't pay your taxes, are you an illegal? What if you get a speeding ticket? A murder conviction? No. You're still not an illegal. Even alleged terrorists and child molesters aren't labeled illegals,” Garcia wrote.

The rebuttal by Ruben Navarrette argued that “undocumented” is both inaccurate and absurd, while “illegal immigrant” is the more factual.

“The phrase is accurate. It's the shoe that fits. It's reality. And, as is often the case with reality, it's hard for some people to accept,” Navarrette wrote.

Related Topics: Arizona immigration law, Maryland Dream Act, and illegal immigration
Which term do you prefer, and why? Is the debate over "illegal" versus "undocumented" as subconsciously sinister as some would suggest, or is this just a bunch of rhetorical hand-wringing? Tell us in the comments.

Nathan

7:35 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

If you are not here legally, then you are illegal. Period! If I go to any other country in the world it would be the same for me, there's no in between.

Reply
Comment_arrow

M Howard County

8:22 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

But Nathan, you have common sense. This whole thing is not about common sense; it is about flooding the country with more "takers."

T S Taylor

8:36 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Mr. Montes and others,
What if suddenly, those in my country illegally, were of the 'Republican' persuation. How might then the county, state and current Federal government react with their sentiments and efforts? Vote buying fraud, with all it's meanings, consequences and growing acceptance, is a destructive toxin to the future of this country - all good will aside. Shame on the Chevy Chase Patch for their dishonest cherry picked photo. From one who was born and grew up on the Texas border....

Reply
Comment_arrow

JustABill

12:24 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Frank .... I challenge you to prove to us all that illegal immigrants are not being shown how to or finding ways to vote. Ever since the motor voter law was passed allowing anyone to simply mail in their voter registration without any personal interaction with a BOE trained human being or requiring them to provide proof of citizenship and the legal right to vote in the registration process there is no guarantee that 1 or 1,000,000 illegal immigrants have not voted in past elections or will not be able to vote in upcoming elections.

However, this whole argument over the adjective used to define their immigration status is moot as soon as they are found to be ILLEGAL! If we are going to redefine ILLEGAL for one purpose then I guess we should redefine it for any purpose that suits our needs or political and social agendas. The next time you are caught speeding just tell the judge you were not illegally driving over the posted speed limit, you were merely adjusting your speed to better suit your needs. The next time a bank robber is caught they should just tell the judge they were not illegally committing bank robbery they were merely making an unauthorized cash withdrawal to better spread the wealth for social justice.

I don't really know why I bother to respond to your mindless remarks on here anymore because you will certainly respond with one of your ridiculous fallacies and rude insults as demonstrated above.

Comment_arrow

Rose Woodruff

1:45 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

The first three people who stayed in the US after their Visas expired who I had any connections to (through people I knew) were a beautiful blond Polish girl, a Scottsman, and a Mexican migrant farm worker who fell in love and had a baby he didn't want to leave. Two of the three don't look much different from my mother, who never had a birth certificate. Like many poor people, she was born at home in Delaware. Fortunately for her, after she for married, my father taught her to drive and took her to get a state issued license. I suppose you could have called her "undocumented." Fortunately, at that time, it was so common, the MD MVA accepted her Baptismal Certificate as proof of citizenship and age. She has had a driver's license ever since. But what of the others, who never learned to drive. There are many legitimate US citizens who are "undocumented." I also disagree with "illegal" as basic human rights would dictate that no one's existence is illegal. There are many people who've been her since before they can remember but whose presence is not authorized by the US government. Since many of these people entered with legitimate visas, many did not enter the country illegally, but it is their continued presence that violates our laws. Therefore, I believe we should use "unauthorized immigrant."

Comment_arrow

JustABill

2:37 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Frank ... I never claimed an illegal immigrant was voting under my father's name but since you seem to want to bring him into the conversation all the time now please give me your address so I can come prove a negative to you personally.

Brigitta Mullican

8:39 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Nathan, people are here illegally because our country has had no control with the people coming over the borders and has encouraged people to come work here for cheap labor. We can't compare other countries because they enforce their laws differently. We have government agencies that have not performed their missions. Children born in the U.S. to illegals have a right and are the innocent ones. The whole issue now is political. There is plenty blame to pass around. What is important is how to take charge in a fair way. It is a delicate problem.

Reply

Joe Robinson

9:00 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

The children are not here illegally - their parents are and I have no problem with The term illegal - they are illegal, there is no way around that and to belabor the point is stupid and has gone on long enough. As for the dream act. I am against it for the same reasons above. If I go to another country illegally, would I be able to go to their schools and universities for what it costs their residents? Hell No. what should be done is make the application for citizenship easier and those law abiding illegals will no longer be illegal.

Reply

Bill Samuel

9:12 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

It's a question of status, not of the merit of the person. "illegal" in referring to a person, not an act or condition, is like "illegitimate" in seeming to deny a person's basic human rights and dignity. The person himself or herself is not illegal (it's not illegal that they are a person). That a person is not authorized to live in this country means they don't have the documents which would authorize them being here. It does not make them illegal as a person. All human beings are legal and legitimate.

Historically dehumanizing terms have been used to justify denying them basic human rights. Terms like "nigger", "gook", "Jap", "kike", "raghead", "cockroach", "illegal", etc. are all used to challenge the God-given human dignity of people and their human rights, and should not be considered acceptable.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joe Thomas

9:20 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

So much politically correct b.s.

Comment_arrow

Commentous

9:29 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Bill--If people call someone an "illegal" there might be some point to your second paragraph. Otherwise, the term "illegal immigrant" uses illegal as an adjective, not a noun. The person is an "immigrant." Whatever adjective one uses (undocumented, unlawful, illegal, etc.) doesn't change that. As an adjective, it's not the same as calling someone any of those other words you used.

Comment_arrow

Corbin Dallas Multipass

9:59 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Commentous - while this topic may be about the term "illegal immigrant" and "undocumented", that doesn't mean in the real word "Illegal" or "Illegals" isn't used as a pejorative noun. https://duckduckgo.com/?q=illegals

Comment_arrow

Corbin Dallas Multipass

10:02 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Commentous - I realize you acknowledge the case, I'm just pointing out that it isn't an if people call someone an "illegal" but rather *when* people call someone an "illegal".

Comment_arrow

KS

1:02 pm on Thursday, August 30, 2012

Should we just call them future democrat-voters?

Comment_arrow

jag

1:07 pm on Thursday, August 30, 2012

"Should we just call them future democrat-voters?"

That, obviously, is up to the Republican party. There are plenty of Rs who are pro-immigration reform (including Condi in her speech last night and Jeb (not to mention the rest of the Bush's) as well). Then again, there are plenty of Rs who are complete racists and look at Hispanics as dirt, too.

Comment_arrow

Brad

1:10 pm on Thursday, August 30, 2012

Undocumented Democrats!

Comment_arrow

Brad

1:17 pm on Thursday, August 30, 2012

I like to think that it will be up to law enforcement. With a new Administration many of these problems will simply head south of the border. No need to compromise our principles when dealing with lawbreakers. Attrition thru enforcement. Those that refuse to leave on their own, when detained by law enforcement at some point, will be banned from permanent residency. Excellent motivation for illegal aliens to leave and sign up for work visas from their homelands.

Joe Thomas

9:19 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

The abhor the word "illegal" because they are here illegally. Its much more politically correct to say "undocumented".

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brad

10:28 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Frank, you hit it right on the head. We need to give dignity and respect to those criminals who have overstayed their travel/education visas or who crossed the Mexican border into the US without permission. We should also thank them for enrolling in our schools causing overcrowded and the need for ESOL programs, using our hospitals, now going bankrupt, our healthcare and social services systems, also pushed to the limit. Lets not forget all the gang violence, rapes, prostitution, drugs, incarceration costs and other "benefits" for our communities. see www.theycometoamerica.com Frank we really need to stop the "bigotry and hate", and continue to welcome those who just lost their documents on their way here. Forget about those one million legal immigrants who come to the US every year the legal and right way. They just followed the rules, but who cares.

Comment_arrow

B Allen

2:02 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Brad, yeah Frankiegirl is right...that is IF you are a leftist, liberal, progressive, socialist, communist, Marxist and whatever other word they describel themselves on any given day. Frankiegirl, screw PC, no bigotry involved here. What you are spewing out is how you left wing nutjobs give criminals (listed below) the benefit of a doubt and that the victims (the MD taxpayers that are getting F***ed) need to prove their innocence. Oh and when I use the term "criminals" I mean whatever you want to call it, undocumented, illegal, (those who aide and abette) Ike Leggett, Martin OWEmalley, Chris Van Hollen, Cardin, Mikulski, the MoCo county council and so on...it is all the same...CRIMINALS...they have bronken the law. Last word Frankiegirl, because you lose AGAIN. Go play with your girlfriends, jag(off), Steveie, Fifa the foot fairy...

Brad

9:53 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Supreme Court Justice used the term "illegal alien" multiple times during the recent case on Arizonia. I also try to use that correct term when speaking about those with no moral or legal right to be in Maryland or the U.S. Enforce the law and this problem goes away real quick.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rose Woodruff

1:50 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

I'm confused. What is a "moral right to be in Maryland?"

Comment_arrow

B Allen

2:04 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

@Rose...a moral and legal right...means you need to be a citizen or have the right documents...otherwise you are ILLEGAL and a CRIMINAL, since you have broken the US law. Maybe you did not get that memo? Look in your in-basket.

Comment_arrow

Brad

9:39 am on Thursday, August 30, 2012

Frank, actually my immigrant grandparents did come with papers and permission. So does the one million legal immigrants a year that come to America. This compares to the lawbreakers, mostly Hispanic illegal immigrants who walk across the border or overstay their education/travel visa. There is a big difference and Maryland citizens know it. In-State Tuition for Illegal Aliens will be defeated in November! Papers do make a difference because these uneducated, illiterate lawbreakers would never be granted a green card.

Brad

9:56 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Thats Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, a Hispanic women no less. Who better then a latina to tell us what the term is correct!

Reply

TaL

9:56 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

If I forget my insurance card at home and get pulled over Im "undocumented". If I didnt have insurance and was operating the car in violation of the law im "illegal".

Same applies here.

Reply
Comment_arrow

TaL

9:58 am on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

That being said, I have no problem with illegals for the most part, they are willing to work 10 times harder than your average american, and god forbid you try and get a middle class teenager/20 something to work at all.

The_legal_immigrant

12:56 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Shoplifting is not undocumented purchase activity; burglary is not an undocumented home visit; rape is not undocumented lovemaking.

They will NEVER be anything but illegal because there are still more decent people in this country, even in Maryland.

Reply
Comment_arrow

B Allen

2:11 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

I get it Legal...hahaha. Then you have those like jag(off) who just does not get it. Even if you spelled everything out with facts and figures...it (jag and his girlfriends) will NEVER get it. No matter how you look at it, undocumented or illegal it is against the law.

Comment_arrow

jag

11:51 pm on Wednesday, August 29, 2012

It's true. B Allen is way smarter than me. Just read his comments. Really the cream of the intellectual crop, obviously. Well, at least for a 12 year old. Quite impressive, how he recycles the same, mundane insults over and over again for, literally, thousands of posts. He's obviously an exceptionally important little boy whose life is really, really valuable.

Carol

1:08 am on Thursday, August 30, 2012

catlady
I have to agree Tal with your words about hard working immigrants
and most want an education and really like school. The Dream Act
will not help anyone with a criminal record.

Reply

Brad

9:31 am on Thursday, August 30, 2012

Let illegal alien students pay the full international student rate at Maryland's college's and universities. That's what they are. Why should Maryland citizens spend another nickel on these lawbreakers and their families? College is not a right. We have enough unemployed Maryland young people competing for jobs.

Reply
Patch_comments_icon

Danna Walker

12:25 pm on Thursday, August 30, 2012

The language we use is so important. It's not something people often think about -- the evolution of everyday usage.

Reply

Juan-Manuel Carrillo

1:14 pm on Thursday, August 30, 2012

I do not like the term ALIEN regardless of who has used it in the past. I was never an alien to this society or this country, so I found the term to be innacurate and pejorative when assigned to me back in 1989. I believe I integrated to this society and this country from day one when my family decided to move here.

I prefer to use the term "undocumented" as “illegal” bothers many people and activist groups. I use the same courtesy I would use if someone said "call me Pete, not Peter" though I think neither ILLEGAL nor UNDOCUMENTED accurately reflect all immigration situations people face. I don’t understand why people have such reactions to this common decency. It should not be a controversial item.

As a little background for anyone still reading this, I was technically “illegal” for 3 months in 1990 due to a mistake done by INS that almost cost me a college scholarship (and therefore, my college education). That eventually got resolved and I contribute to this society in many different ways. I was lucky to be part of an educated middle class family that could afford an attorney when things went sour. I know many other people get unfairly turned down everyday for legal residence and many have no means or knowledge to reverse the issue. Perhaps I am biased for wanting those people to have the same opportunities I have in this country. I am not afraid they will take “our jobs” like other posters here.

Reply

Fran Williams

1:46 pm on Wednesday, September 19, 2012

In the 1990's, the mexican government changed their law to permit recongnition of dual citizenship, American and mexican. The mexicans that invade the U.S. illegally have no loyality here. They come here to take, not to contribute. There are billions of 'undocumented' wages paid under the table. There are billions of 'undocumented' money sent to mexico, some of which is hand carried over the border. I personally know of one person who continues to scam the SSI disability, while working under the table. She refused to go back to her regular job because she owed taxes and the IRS would not persue disability SSI payments. She use to run a bar that accepted cash only. She never reported all the money she brought in and drove 3 million in cash into mexico. She is now working in mexico at a resort and still collecting disability while she continues her fraud. The whole family is involved in fraudulant activities. I tried to report her sister to EDD for committing fraud in order to steal unemployment payments belonging to someone else. The person I spoke with at EDD (hispanic accent) said they will NOT pursue the matter because she was hispanic. So I have become jaded because of all the fraud and criminal activities I personally have witnessed and tried to report. Our government is allowing an entire culture of people to ravish our country at tax payer expense. You have no idea how sickened I am from all that I've seen.

Reply

Leave a comment