Councilmen Say 6D Station Should Wait
Craig Rice and Phil Andrews back County Executive Isiah Leggett's decision to postpone the four-year-old plan for building the Montgomery Village-Gaithersburg district's first permanent station.
The two County Councilmen whose jurisdictions overlap into the 6th police district are supporting last week's cost-cutting measure to drop a proposed $22 million police station from Montgomery County’s long-term construction budget—which leaves officers to operate out of a temporary space west of Interstate 270 and puts the project in limbo for at least two more years.
Last week, County Executive Isiah Leggett nixed the proposal for building the Montgomery Village-Gaithersburg district's first permanent station from his fiscal 2013-2018 update to the Capital Improvements Program, citing his conviction to keep capital spending within $295 million per year.
The move blindsided community leaders in Montgomery Village. Amid the uproar, state representatives and the Montgomery Village Foundation are trying to mount campaigns to pressure the County Council to restore the project when it approves the CIP budget in May.
But Councilmen Craig Rice and Phil Andrews say they will not push to restore the police station's funding because they are convinced that the temporary site is sufficient in light of other capital projects that have no viable alternatives.
Craig Rice, Montgomery Village’s representative on the council, was told of the move during talks with police brass in the weeks leading up to Leggett's decision. Police Chief J. Thomas Manger and 6th District commander Capt. Willie Parker-Loan assured Rice that the $416,000-per-year leased space is "much more economical," he said.
"I’m in full support. Any money that we can save and put back toward other things is a good thing," said Rice (D-Dist. 2) of Germantown. "… Inevitably at some point, we’re going to build one. But without having the money, this is one that made sense for us to not push forward."
On Feb. 16, the CIP goes to the council’s Public Safety committee, of which Phil Andrews is chairman.
"Based on my own knowledge of how the 6th District station is operating now, it’s a sensible decision," said Andrews (D-Dist. 3) of Gaithersburg. "First, the response that is provided is not from the station; it’s from patrol cars that are on the road. So it’s not the case that having the station where it is now results in a diminished response time to portions of the 6th District."
Don O'Neill
10:39 am on Saturday, March 24, 2012
I have total confidence in Chief Manger.
Montgomery Village residents should be concerned with just one thing... the response time to an incident. Phil Andrews provided assurance that response time and the location of the 6th Police District Station are not coupled when he said, "I have total confidence in Chief Manger.
Montgomery Village residents should be concerned with just one thing... the response time to an incident. Councilman Phil Andrews provided assurance that response time and the location of the 6th District Police Station are decoupled when he said, "First, the response that is provided is not from the station; it’s from patrol cars that are on the road. So it’s not the case that having the station where it is now results in a diminished response time to portions of the 6th District."
Ike Leggett and the County Council are facing tough choices on behalf of Montgomery County residents. Fortunately the choice to postpone any action on the 6th Police District Station was an easy choice... and a wise decision. In asking for more police officers, Ike Leggett is addressing the real needs... well trained, well equipped officers on patrol.
MD
11:50 am on Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Totally agree, its not about office space as much as having the number of officers/cars. Montgomery Village can do its part by stop asking for public money on everything. The Village has to start spending the reserves if they want things done rather than asking the county/state for it. And maybe if we had a better and decent security, we wouldnt need so much but then again, why have security when we arent a closed gate community?? hmmm, maybe we can start trimming the MVF budget...
Sally Joyner
1:29 pm on Tuesday, March 27, 2012
Do you not both get it? My HOA hires our own security in North Village. The MVF has nothing to do with whom we hire or what we have them do for us under their contract. I believe that the other HOAs hire their own as well. As for asking for grant funding from the State, I assume you would rather see funds go elsewhere in the State of Maryland, Remember it is our tax dollars they come back to us from the State.
There is still time. Why not just let it go..